USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/10975 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43641764.pdf300KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Landowner willingness to participate in a Texas brush reduction program.
Authors: Kreuter, U.P.
Tays, M.R.
Conner, J.R.
USDA, ARS
Source: Journal of range management. 2004 May, v. 57, no. 3, p. 230-237.
NALT Subjects: range improvement
brush control
watershed management
ranching
landowners
farm size
population growth
water supply
canopy
woody weeds
shrubs
Juniperus
Quercus virginiana
Prosopis
cost benefit analysis
farmers' attitudes
government payments
Texas
Other Subjects: cost-sharing programs
Issue Date: May-2004
Abstract: Because most of Texas consists of privately owned land and the amount of brush cover on rangelands may affect off-site water yields, there has been increasing interest in publicly funded brush clearing programs aimed at increasing water yield. The Pedernales River was selected as 1 of 8 watersheds to determine the feasibility of implementing such a program. A survey questionnaire was mailed to 720 landowners in Blanco and Gillespie County (containing most of the Pedernales watershed) in June 2000 to identify factors that influence their interest in participating in a brush reduction program. The sample consisted of equal numbers of landowners with 4-20, 21-202, and > 202 ha of land. Fifty eight percent of the survey participants responded, 82% of whom answered questions about their willingness to enroll at least part of their land in a brush reduction program. Property size and income from wildlife were found to be significant positive determinants and level of satisfaction with brush a significant negative determinant of respondents' willingness to enroll. To optimize public investments, it may be preferable to maximize the area enrolled in a brush removal program by targeting larger landowners who appear to be willing to enroll larger portions of their land without requiring compensation that exceeds their net cost of enrollment. Because land in the Edwards Plateau is being subdivided and purchased by people who do not depend on land-based income and who may be more tolerant of brush, public funds required to encourage landowner participation may increase over time.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/10975
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43641764.pdf300KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House