USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/13756 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND22021495.pdf179KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Ensiling of potato vines.
Authors: Muck, R.E.
Weinberg, Z.G.
Rouse, D.I.
Igl, B.R.
USDA, ARS
Source: Transactions of the ASAE. May/June 1999. v. 42 (3), p. 565-572.
NALT Subjects: potatoes
varieties
silage making
fermentation
storage
duration
Other Subjects: preservation
contaminants
feed preservation methods
Issue Date: May-1999
Abstract: Potato vines are a potential feed for cattle if the vines can be preserved. The objectives of this study were primarily to study alternative methods to preserve potato vines by ensiling and determine the effects of soil contamination on ensiling. In experiment 1, vines from four potato varieties were harvested individually with a flail chopper set at three heights to vary soil contamination. The chopped vines were ensiled in minisilos alone or amended (3:1, vines to amendment, wet basis) with either chopped alfalfa hay or barley grain. Silos were opened after 90 d for analysis. In experiment 2, vines of one variety were hand-harvested and ensiled fresh or after wilting one day in a greenhouse, alone or in combination with chopped whole plant corn at one of four levels. Silos were opened for analysis after 1, 2, 6, 14 and 90 d ensiling. The vines in both experiments were of high nutritive value with high crude protein contents [194-261 g kg(-1) dry matter (DM)] and low neutral detergent fiber contents (286-359 g kg(-1) DM). However, ash contents were relatively high even with low soil contamination (220-307 g kg(-1) DM) and hand-harvested vines (169 g kg(-1) DM). In both experiments, unamended vines were poorly preserved, underwent a secondary fermentation, and were unstable aerobically. Little or no lactic acid was present in these silages, acetic acid was the predominant fermentation product, and butyric acid was detected in some silages. In contrast, all three amendments produced well-preserved silages. Barley-amended silages yielded the lowest pHs (4.06 average); alfalfa-amended silages yielded the highest (4.97 average). In a 5-d aerobic stability test, some barley-amended replicates heated while none of the alfalfa- or corn-amended silages heated. Level of soil contamination had no consistent negative effect on fermentation, but the added soil substantially diluted vine dry matter in the high contamination treatments.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/13756
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND22021495.pdf179KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House