USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/16642 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND23314733.pdf119KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Separating the impacts of crop diversification and rotations on risk.
Authors: Helmers, G.A.
Yamoah, C.F.
Varvel, G.E.
USDA, ARS
Source: Agronomy journal. Nov/Dec 2001. v. 93 (6), p. 1337-1340.
NALT Subjects: Glycine max
Zea mays
risk assessment
crop rotation
risk reduction
quantitative analysis
crop yield
profitability
costs and returns
continuous cropping
Nebraska
Other Subjects: stability
Issue Date: Nov-2001
Abstract: It has been commonly accepted that crop rotations reduce risk compared with monoculture systems. Quantifying this phenomenon requires that effects of yield stability on risk (positive or negative) arising from rotating crops be separated from other risk elements. Using an ARS-University of Nebraska series of yields for corn (Zea mays L.) and soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] grown over a 14-yr period, both in rotation and in monoculture, the impact of crop rotation on risk was isolated and estimated. Risk was defined as the failure to meet an annual per-hectare net return target. A corn-soybean rotation had significantly less risk than monoculture practices. Diversification was found to contribute to part of this reduction while higher yields and reduced cost contributed to the remainder. This reduction in risk occurred even though the corn-soybean rotation had a higher yield variance.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/16642
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND23314733.pdf119KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House