USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/16860 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43723304.pdf344KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: The importance of canopy structure in controlling the interception loss of rainfall: examples from a young and an old-growth Douglas-fir forest.
Authors: Pypker, T.G.
Bond, B.J.
Link, T.E.
Marks, D.
Unsworth, M.H.
USDA, ARS
Source: Agricultural and forest meteorology. 2005 May 24, v. 130, issue 1-2, p. 113-129.
NALT Subjects: Pseudotsuga menziesii
tree age
forest trees
coniferous forests
overstory
rain
throughfall
stemflow
evaporation
regression analysis
mathematical models
phenology
temporal variation
seasonal variation
Washington
Other Subjects: stand dynamics
interception loss
Issue Date: 24-May-2005
Abstract: The canopy water storage capacity (S), direct throughfall fraction (p), the ratio of evaporation to rainfall intensity (E/R) and interception loss (I(n)), of a Douglas-fir forest are influenced by short (seasonal) and long-term (decades to centuries) changes in the forest canopy. Gross precipitation (P(G)) and net precipitation (P(n)) were measured in a young (25-year-old) Douglas-fir forest and the results compared with measurements previously made in a nearby old-growth (>450-year-old) Douglas-fir forest [Link, T.E., Unsworth, M.H., Marks, D., 2004. The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 124, 171-191.]. Canopy rainfall variables were estimated using a regression-based method that estimates S, p and E/R for individual storms using the relationship between P(G) and P(n). The individual storm estimates of S, p and E/R for the young forest were applied to a rainfall interception model (Gash model [Gash, J.H.C., 1979. An analytical model of rainfall interception by forest. Q. J. R. Meteorol. Soc. 105, 43-55.]) to determine the effect of seasonal changes in canopy hydrologic variables have on estimates of I(n) (young forest only). The Gash model was previously applied to the old-growth forest [Link, T.E., Unsworth, M.H., Marks, D., 2004. The dynamics of rainfall interception by a seasonal temperate rainforest. Agric. Forest Meteorol. 124, 171-191.]. The young forest had significantly different S (1.40 mm +/- 0.27) and p (0.12 +/- 0.07) relative to the old-growth forest (S = 3.32 +/- 0.35; p = 0.42 +/- 0.07). Seasonal variation in canopy structure, such as deciduous leaf senescence and coniferous needle drop, were correlated with decreases in S. The differences in S and p between the two forests resulted in an I(n) that was only slightly larger in the old-growth forest because the E/R for the two forests were similar (young = 0.18 +/- 0.06; old-growth = 0.17 +/- 0.08). E/R in the young and old-growth forests may have been similar because developmental changes associated with old-growth forest may alter the external resistance (r(a)) and the effective area for evaporation. The Gash model successfully predicted I(n) for the young forest on a seasonal basis (3.29% error), but experienced larger errors (range = -91 to 36% error) for individual storms. The seasonal error and the error for individual storms improved when seasonal variations in canopy characteristics were incorporated in the model (seasonal error = 2.37%; individual storm error range = -12.0 to 21.7%). Therefore, short-term (seasonal) changes in phenology and long-term (decades to centuries) horizontal and vertical development of the forest canopy influence S, p, I(n) and E/R of Douglas-fir forests.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/16860
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43723304.pdf344KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House