USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17392 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND90053308.pdf155KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Nitrogen fertilizer recovery by corn in monoculture and rotation systems.
Authors: Varvel, G.E.
Peterson, T.A.
USDA, ARS
Source: Agronomy journal. Sept/Oct 1990. v. 82 (5), p. 935-938.
NALT Subjects: Zea mays
continuous cropping
crop rotation
Glycine max
Avena sativa
Trifolium pratense
Sorghum bicolor
nitrogen fertilizers
nutrient uptake
nitrogen
analytical methods
Nebraska
Other Subjects: recovery
Issue Date: Sep-1990
Abstract: Crop rotations including legumes have increased in importance because of their potential to reduce large inorganic N fertilizer needs for corn [Zea mays L.) and other crops. This study was conducted to determine N fertilizer recovery by corn in monoculture and rotational systems. Corn was grown under rainfed conditions on a Sharpsburg silty clay loam (fine, montmorillinitic, mesic, Typic Argiudoll) in four cropping systems: (i) continuous corn monoculture, ii) a 2-yr soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.]-corn rotation, (iii) a 4-yr rotation of oat [Avena sativa L.)] + clover [80% Melilotus officinalis (L.) and 20% Trifolium pratense]-grain sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.)]-soybean-corn, and (iv) a 4-yr rotation of soybean-grain sorghum-oat + clover-corn at Mead, NE. Broadcast applications of 15N-depleted NH4NO3 were made at 90 and 180 kg N ha-1 in 1985 and 1986 to evaluate N fertilizer recovery by corn in each cropping system using isotopic methods. Nitrogen recovery determined by isotopic methods was significantly higher for corn in rotation vs. corn in monoculture, averaging 58.6 vs. 52.3% and 49.8 vs. 43.4% at the 90 and 180 kg N ha-1 rates, respectively. In contrast, fertilizer N recovery estimated by the difference method was much greater in continuous corn vs. N recovery in corn following oat + clover in the 4-yr rotation. These differences indicated that N fertilizer applied to corn in each cropping system appeared to be entering different sizes and types of organic soil N pools, resulting in apparent differences in N immobilization. Our results demonstrate problems exist in estimating fertilizer N recovery with both methods (isotope or difference) and before accurate N recovery estimates by corn or any other crop can be made in complex soil and crop management systems, procedures must be developed to explicitly follow N fertilizer pathways (immobilization, denitrification, volatilization, leaching, etc.). Until that time, correct interpretations with either method can be obtained within a system if all available information is used regarding both soil and crop factors.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17392
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND90053308.pdf155KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House