USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17690 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44076004.pdf5790KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Broad-Scale Classification and Mapping of Tree Size and Density Attributes in Productive Old-Growth Forests in Southeast Alaska's Tongass National Forest.
Authors: Caouette, J.P.
DeGayner, E.J.
USDA, FS
Source: Western journal of applied forestry. 2008 Apr., v. 23, no. 2, p. 106-112.
NALT Subjects: old-growth forests
coastal forests
stand density
spatial data
stand structure
spatial distribution
tree and stand measurements
forest trees
models
accuracy
statistical analysis
Alaska
Tongass National Forest
Other Subjects: mapping classes
tree size
stand density index
Issue Date: Apr-2008
Abstract: The forest classification and mapping system currently used in managing the Tongass National Forest (NF) is based largely on an economic forest measure, net board foot volume per acre. Although useful for timber economic modeling, this forest measure poorly differentiates old-growth forest types in a way that is meaningful to ecological and social concerns. In 2005, we published an article presenting a proposed tree size and tree density mapping model for the Tongass NF. We claimed the model would provide better information on the structural patterns in old-growth forests than did the current mapping models based on net board foot volume per acre. We also stated that further testing of our proposed model is required before it can be fully integrated into forest management plans and landscape analysis. In this article, we used independent field data to evaluate our proposed tree size and density model and better define its accuracy. Results showed differences among mapping classes similar to differences observed in the development stages of the model. Results also showed mapping accuracy estimates between 60 and 80%. We used the model in a forest management application by comparing the representation of old-growth forest types within a landscape to the representation within a management-defined subset of that landscape.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/17690
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44076004.pdf5790KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House