USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/21544 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44050157.pdf773KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Effects of repeated cottonwood leaf beetle defoliation on Populus growth and economic value over an 8-year harvest rotation.
Authors: Coyle, David R.
Hart, Elwood R.
McMillin, Joel D.
Rule, Lita C.
Hall, Richard B.
USDA, FS
Source: Forest ecology and management. 2008 May 15, v. 255, no. 8-9 [Amsterdam]: Elsevier Science, p. 3365-3373.
NALT Subjects: Populus
forest trees
tree growth
defoliation
phytophagous insects
Chrysomela scripta
insecticides
tree mortality
dry matter accumulation
branches
basal area
stems
tree and stand measurements
clones
branching
forest yields
costs and returns
prices
economic analysis
Issue Date: 15-May-2008
Abstract: The effects of 8 years of cottonwood leaf beetle, Chrysomela scripta, defoliation on growth and economic value of four Populus clones (91x04-03, D105, Eugenei, and NM2) was investigated in a split-plot randomized complete block design with unprotected and insecticide-protected plots. After 8 years clones 91x04-03 and D105 had significantly greater survival than Eugenei or NM2. This difference in survival was not attributed to chemical protection, and while not qualified, was most likely the result of disease and storm breakage. Protected trees had significantly greater height, diameter, and stem volume than unprotected trees, with clone 91x04-03 consistently growing the largest. Protected plots had greater basal area and stem biomass than unprotected plots, but branch biomass was greatest in unprotected plots. Differences in branch biomass were most likely due to loss of apical dominance, and subsequent increased branching, resulting from C. scripta defoliation. Aboveground biomass was unaffected by treatment because of the increased branch biomass of unprotected trees. Clone 91x04-03 responded the most positively to chemical protection, as stem volume of unprotected trees was over 30% less than in protected trees. A financial analysis of our data indicated that none of the clonextreatment combinations would be economically acceptable due to the high land costs in the midwestern US. However, the use of less expensive insecticides may make clone 91x04-03 an economically viable crop in this region.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/21544
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44050157.pdf773KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House