USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/27657 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44171551.pdf4852KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Naturally Seeded versus Planted Ponderosa Pine Seedlings in Group-Selection Openings.
Authors: McDonald, Philip M.
Fiddler, Gary
Ritchie, Martin
Anderson, Paula
USDA, FS
Source: Western journal of applied forestry. 2009 Jan., v. 24, no. 1, p. 48-54.
NALT Subjects: Pinus ponderosa
natural regeneration
artificial regeneration
forest trees
coniferous forests
seedlings
vigor
seedling growth
height
diameter
edge effects
silviculture
canopy gaps
plant communities
botanical composition
density
Arctostaphylos
conifers
environmental factors
California
Other Subjects: growth advantage
group-selection cutting
planted seedlings
natural seedlings
opening size
Issue Date: Jan-2009
Abstract: The purpose of this article was to determine whether natural regeneration or planted seedlings should be used in group-selection openings. The answer depends on the survival and growth rate of both types of seedlings, and that could depend on the size of the openings and the effect of trees on their edge. In this side-by-side study, the natural pine seedlings originated from the 1988 seed crop and the 1-0 nursery-grown seedlings were outplanted in spring 1989. Openings ranged from 0.01 to 0.65 ha. The plant community consisted of many species of shrubs, forbs, and grasses with manzanita having the highest density and greatest development. After 9 years, manzanita had an average density of 13,870 plants/ha, 2,050 m2/ha of foliar cover, and was 125 cm tall. From 1990 to 1997, planted ponderosa pine seedlings were taller (P < 0.05) than natural seedlings, and from 1995 to 1997, mean stem diameter at 30 cm of planted seedlings was larger than natural counterparts (P < 0.05). Development for 1 year in the nursery apparently gave the planted seedlings a growth advantage over the natural seedlings. For natural seedlings, distance from opening edge had little effect on pine height or diameter growth regardless of opening size. Planted seedlings, however, appeared to increase in height and diameter growth with both opening size and distance from edge.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/27657
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44171551.pdf4852KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House