USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/29677 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44206932.pdf853KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Regression modeling and mapping of coniferous forest basal area and tree density from discrete-return lidar and multispectral satellite data.
Authors: Hudak, Andrew T.
Crookston, Nicholas L.
Evans, Jeffrey S.
Falkowski, Michael J.
Smith, Alistair M.S.
Gessler, Paul E.
Morgan, Penelope
USDA, FS
Source: Canadian journal of remote sensing. 2006 Apr., v. 32, no. 2, p. 126-138.
NALT Subjects: coniferous forests
forest mensuration
spectral analysis
tree and stand measurements
lidar
remote sensing
statistical models
forest trees
density
basal area
stand structure
vegetation structure
satellites
image analysis
accuracy
regression analysis
prediction
spatial data
Idaho
Issue Date: Apr-2006
Abstract: We compared the utility of discrete-return light detection and ranging (lidar) data and multispectral satellite imagery, and their integration, for modeling and mapping basal area and tree density across two diverse coniferous forest landscapes in north-central Idaho. We applied multiple linear regression models subset from a suite of 26 predictor variables derived from discrete-return lidar data (2 m post spacing), advanced land imager (ALI) multispectral (30 m) and panchromatic (10 m) data, or geographic X, Y, and Z location. In general, the lidar-derived variables had greater utility than the ALI variables for predicting the response variables, especially basal area. The variables most useful for predicting basal area were lidar height variables, followed by lidar intensity; those most useful for predicting tree density were lidar canopy cover variables, again followed by lidar intensity. The best integrated models selected via a best-subsets procedure explained ~90% of variance in both response variables. Natural-logarithm-transformed response variables were modeled. Predictions were then transformed from the natural logarithm scale back to the natural scale, corrected for transformation bias, and mapped across the two study areas. This study demonstrates that fundamental forest structure attributes can be modeled to acceptable accuracy and mapped with currently available remote sensing technologies.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/29677
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44206932.pdf853KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House