USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/31687 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44229182.pdf3580KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Developing resilient ponderosa pine forests with mechanical thinning and prescribed fire in central Oregon's pumice region.
Authors: Busse, Matt D.
Cochran, P.H.
Hopkins, William E.
Johnson, William H.
Riegel, Gregg M.
Fiddler, Gary O.
Ratcliff, Alice W.
Shestak, Carol J.
USDA, FS
Source: Canadian journal of forest research. 2009 June, v. 39, no. 6, p. 1171-1185.
NALT Subjects: coniferous forests
Pinus ponderosa
silvicultural practices
forest management
forest growth
forest health
prescribed burning
forest thinning
vegetation structure
vegetation cover
forest trees
vigor
species diversity
tree mortality
stand density
slash
fire hazard reduction
fuels (fire ecology)
forest yields
nutrients
understory
shrubs
fertilizer application
Oregon
Other Subjects: site productivity
Issue Date: Jun-2009
Abstract: Thinning and prescribed burning are common management practices for reducing fuel buildup in ponderosa pine forests. However, it is not well understood if their combined use is required to lower wildfire risk and to help restore natural ecological function. We compared 16 treatment combinations of thinning, prescribed fire, and slash retention for two decades across a site quality gradient of second-growth pine stands, measuring changes in forest vegetation growth, structure, and composition. Thinning alone doubled the diameter growth increment of ponderosa pine, moderately stimulated shrub production, and resulted in lower tree mortality compared with unthinned plots. In contrast, repeated fire alone did not substantially alter stand structure or increase tree vigor, herbaceous production, or plant diversity. The combined use of thinning and repeated burning reduced shrub cover, yet produced no changes in herbaceous production, plant diversity, stand structure, or tree vigor compared with thin-only treatments. Additional findings identified (1) inconsequential effects of thinning residues on site productivity, (2) the need for multiple entries of prescribed fire if the abatement of shrubs is required, (3) the ineffectiveness of repeated burning to stimulate plant growth, and (4) that the thinning treatment served as an effective surrogate to fire for managing central Oregon forest vegetation.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/31687
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44229182.pdf3580KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House