USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/32515 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44234466.pdf566KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Weed Science Research and Funding: A Call to Action.
Authors: Davis, Adam S.
Hall, J. Christopher
Jasieniuk, Marie
Locke, Martin A.
Luschei, Edward C.
Mortensen, David A.
Riechers, Dean E.
Smith, Richard G.
Sterling, Tracy M.
Westwood, James H.
USDA, ARS
Source: Weed science. 2009 July, v. 57, no. 4, p. 442-448.
NALT Subjects: weeds
weed science
agricultural research
research support
agricultural history
herbicides
vegetation
literature reviews
plant communities
invasive species
organizations
ecosystems
land restoration
Other Subjects: weedy traits
Issue Date: Jul-2009
Abstract: Weed science has contributed much to agriculture, forestry and natural resource management during its history. However, if it is to remain relevant as a scientific discipline, it is long past time for weed scientists to move beyond a dominating focus on herbicide efficacy testing and address the basic science underlying complex issues in vegetation management at many levels of biological organization currently being solved by others, such as invasion ecologists and molecular biologists. Weed science must not be circumscribed by a narrowly-defined set of tools but rather be seen as an integrating discipline. As a means of assessing current and future research interests and funding trends among weed scientists, the Weed Science Society of America conducted an online survey of its members in summer of 2007. There were 304 respondents out of a membership of 1330 at the time of the survey, a response rate of 23%. The largest group of respondents (41%) reported working on research problems primarily focused on herbicide efficacy and maintenance, funded mainly by private industry sources. Another smaller group of respondents (22%) reported focusing on research topics with a complex systems focus (such as invasion biology, ecosystem restoration, ecological weed management, and the genetics, molecular biology, and physiology of weedy traits), funded primarily by public sources. Increased cooperation between these complementary groups of scientists will be an essential step in making weed science increasingly relevant to the complex vegetation management issues of the 21st century.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/32515
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND44234466.pdf566KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House