USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/6850 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43793677.pdf352KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Fumigant distribution in forest nursery soils under water seal and plastic film after application of dazomet, metam-sodium and chloropicrin.
Authors: Wang, D.
Fraedrich, S.W.
Juzwik, J.
Spokas, K.
Zhang, Y.
Koskinen, W.C.
USDA, FS
Source: Pest management science. 2006 Mar., v. 62, issue 3, p. 263-273.
NALT Subjects: forest nurseries
crop management
forest soils
soil-borne diseases
plant pathogenic fungi
plant pathogenic bacteria
plant viruses
disease control
soil fumigation
fungicides
pesticides
dazomet
metam
chloropicrin
application rate
plastic film
weed control
herbicides
plant parasitic nematodes
nematode control
Wisconsin
Georgia
Other Subjects: water seal covers
Issue Date: Mar-2006
Abstract: Adequate concentration, exposure time and distribution uniformity of activated fumigant gases are prerequisites for successful soil fumigation. Field experiments were conducted to evaluate gas phase distributions of methyl isothiocyanate (MITC) and chloropicrin (CP) in two forest-tree nurseries. Concentrations of MITC and CP in soil air were measured from replicated microplots that received dazomet, metam-sodium and CP. Half of the plots were covered with high-density polyethylene tarp immediately after fumigation; the other half were not covered but received daily sprinkler irrigation for 1 week to create and maintain a water seal. The magnitude of MITC concentrations was similar between nurseries for metam-sodium in both tarp and water seal treatments and for dazomet in the tarp treatment. Consistently greater MITC and CP concentrations were found in the upper 30 cm of soil in the tarped plots compared with the water-sealed plots. Despite potential environmental and economic benefits with the water seal method, tarp covers were more reliable for achieving and maintaining higher MITC and CP concentrations and less prone to variations due to irrigation/rain, soil bulk density and other environmental conditions.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/6850
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43793677.pdf352KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House