USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/7354 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43817294.pdf108KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Quality assurance during data processing of food and nutrient intakes.
Authors: Anand, J.
Raper, N.R.
Tong, A.
USDA, ARS
Source: Journal of food composition and analysis : an official publication of the United Nations University, International Network of Food Data Systems. 2006 Aug., v. 19, suppl. 1, p. S86-S90.
NALT Subjects: food intake
nutrient intake
food composition
nutrient databanks
National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey
data collection
diet recall
quality control
accuracy
USDA
nutrition research
Other Subjects: The Food Surveys Research Group (FSRG)
Issue Date: Aug-2006
Abstract: The Food Surveys Research Group (FSRG) is responsible for methods of data collection and processing of dietary intake data, including the What We Eat in America Survey, which is the dietary interview component of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Many measures have been implemented to ensure accuracy of the dietary data, such as a state-of-the-art data collection instrument and an extensive food and nutrient database. Also important, but usually receiving less public attention is the quality assurance taking place during data processing. A four-part quality assurance procedure is used for food intake data processed by FSRG. This includes (1) determination of overall acceptability of each 24-h recall, (2) resolution of new or unusual foods and amounts, (3) administration of data integrity checks, and (4) verification of 24-h recalls with extremely high nutrient intakes. Quality assurance not only contributes to the accuracy and validity of a specific set of dietary intake data, it also benefits future studies because findings help identify areas to target for interviewer training or for improvements in data collection and processing procedures.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/7354
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43817294.pdf108KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House