USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/7752 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43965267.pdf434KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Life-cycle assessment of net greenhouse-gas flux for bioenergy cropping systems.
Authors: Adler, P.R.
Del Grosso, S.J.
Parton, W.J.
USDA, ARS
Source: Ecological applications : a publication of the Ecological Society of America. 2007 Apr., v. 17, no. 3, p. 675-691.
NALT Subjects: biogeochemical cycles
biofuels
crop production
crop yield
biomass
Zea mays
Glycine max
Medicago sativa
Populus
Panicum virgatum
Phalaris arundinacea
crop rotation
greenhouse gases
gas emissions
simulation models
mathematical models
gas exchange
nitrous oxide
cropping systems
soil organic matter
carbon sequestration
Pennsylvania
Other Subjects: biofuel crops
DAYCENT model
bioenergy crops
greenhouse gas sinks
Issue Date: Apr-2007
Abstract: Bioenergy cropping systems could help offset greenhouse gas emissions, but quantifying that offset is complex. Bioenergy crops offset carbon dioxide emissions by converting atmospheric CO2 to organic C in crop biomass and soil, but they also emit nitrous oxide and vary in their effects on soil oxidation of methane. Growing the crops requires energy (e.g., to operate farm machinery, produce inputs such as fertilizer) and so does converting the harvested product to usable fuels (feedstock conversion efficiency). The objective of this study was to quantify all these factors to determine the net effect of several bioenergy cropping systems on greenhouse-gas (GHG) emissions. We used the DAYCENT biogeochemistry model to assess soil GHG fluxes and biomass yields for corn, soybean, alfalfa, hybrid poplar, reed canarygrass, and switchgrass as bioenergy crops in Pennsylvania, USA. DAYCENT results were combined with estimates of fossil fuels used to provide farm inputs and operate agricultural machinery and fossil-fuel offsets from biomass yields to calculate net GHG fluxes for each cropping system considered. Displaced fossil fuel was the largest GHG sink, followed by soil carbon sequestration. N2O emissions were the largest GHG source. All cropping systems considered provided net GHG sinks, even when soil C was assumed to reach a new steady state and C sequestration in soil was not counted. Hybrid poplar and switchgrass provided the largest net GHG sinks, >200 g CO2e-C·m-2·yr-1 for biomass conversion to ethanol, and >400 g CO2e-C·m-2·yr-1 for biomass gasification for electricity generation. Compared with the life cycle of gasoline and diesel, ethanol and biodiesel from corn rotations reduced GHG emissions by 40%, reed canarygrass by 85%, and switchgrass and hybrid poplar by 115%.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/7752
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43965267.pdf434KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House