USDA.gov
Agspace Masthead
  HomeAbout AgSpaceNewsCurrent ProjectsagricolaHelpContact Us
 Search National Agricultural Library
 
advanced search
search tips
browse by subject
Submit to AgSpace
usda
Browse by subject
updates
profile
 
Please use this persistent URL to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/10113/9684 ◀ bookmark this

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43642039.pdf1543KbAdobe PDFView/Open
Title: Detection and quantification of nursery spray penetration and off-target loss with electron beam and conductivity analysis.
Authors: Krause, C.R.
Zhu, H.
Fox, R.D.
Brazee, R.D.
Derksen, R.C.
Horst, L.E.
Zondag, R.H.
USDA, ARS
Source: Transactions of the ASAE. 2004 Mar-Apr, v. 47, no. 2, p. 375-384.
NALT Subjects: Gleditsia triacanthos
Tsuga canadensis
plant nurseries
forest nurseries
foliar spraying
fertilizer application
calcium nitrate
pesticide application
copper hydroxide
tree crown
spray drift
spray deposition
analytical methods
Issue Date: Mar-2004
Abstract: Spray penetration and off-target loss from a conventional, air-assist, axial-fan sprayer and a high-clearance, boom-type sprayer were investigated in Honey Locust (Gleditsia triacanthos) and Canadian Hemlock (Tsuga canadensis) trees located in two different production nurseries. Aqueous tracer solutions of either Ca(NO3)2 foliar fertilizer or Cu(OH)2 fungicide were used in the experiments. Spray deposition distributions within canopies and off-target loss to drift and the ground were assessed via residues collected on foliage, electron microscope stubs, artificial plates, vertical and ground-level profile plastic tapes, and high-volume air samplers. Electron beam analysis (EBA) was used to assay residues on stubs, leaves, and needles placed and collected at several locations and heights in the canopy. Plastic tape samples were evaluated with a laboratory spray deposit analyzer using a conductivity detector. Both assessment methods used in the present study were useful for detection and quantification of Ca or Cu spray penetration within nursery canopies. The average spray deposit on upper surfaces of leaves was three times that deposited on lower surfaces within the Honey Locust trees. Spray deposit at the top of Canadian Hemlock tree canopies was 14 times higher than that at the middle and bottom of canopies. Spray deposit on ground targets greatly decreased as the distance from the spray path increased in both nurseries; however, airborne spray deposits did not decrease as much with increasing downwind distance as ground deposits.
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/10113/9684
Appears in Collections:USDA Research and Information

Files in This Item:

File SizeFormat
IND43642039.pdf1543KbAdobe PDFView/Open

--------- --------- ----------------


Powered by DSpace

 DDR Home | AgSpace Home | NAL Home | USDA | ARS | Science.gov | GPO Access | Policies and Links | FOIA | NAL Thesaurus
Accessibility Statement | Privacy Policy | Non-Discrimination Statement | Information Quality | USA.gov | White House